Anti-RH1 alloimmunization: At what maternal antibody threshold is there a risk of severe fetal anemia?

BACKGROUND: To define a threshold of maternal antibodies at risk of severe fetal anemia in patients followed for anti-RH1 alloimmunization (AI). STUDY, DESIGN, AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients followed for anti-RH1 AI at the Lille University Hospital. The first group, severe anemia, included patients who received one or more in utero transfusions (IUT) or who were induced before 37 weeks of pregnancy for suspected severe fetal anemia. The second group, absence of severe anemia, corresponded to patients without intervention during pregnancy related to AI. Sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values for screening for severe fetal anemia were calculated for the antibody thresholds of 3.5 and 5 IU/ml for the quantification. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2018, 207 patients were included 135 in the severe anemia group and 72 in the no severe anemia group. No severe anemia was observed for an antibody titer below 16. For an antibody threshold of 3.5 IU/ml, the sensitivity was 98.2%, with 30.2% false positives. All severe anemias were detected in the second trimester; two cases of severe anemia were not detected in the third trimester. For an antibody threshold of 5 IU/ml, the sensitivity was lower at 95.6%, with five cases of severe anemia not detected. CONCLUSION: The antibody threshold of 3.5 IU/ml for the quantification and 16 for the titration allow targeting patients requiring close monitoring by an experienced team in case of anti-RH1 AI.

Maternal red blood cell alloimmunization requiring intrauterine transfusion: a comparative study on management and outcome depending on the type of antibody.

BACKGROUND: The antibody primarily responsible for fetal anemia may influence treatment and prognosis. The primary objective was to compare ante- and postnatal management and the outcomes of maternal red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunizations according to the antibody involved. The secondary objective was to compare anti-D alloimmunizations according to associated number of antibodies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A single-center study from 1999 to 2015 including maternal RBC alloimmunizations requiring intrauterine transfusion (IUT) was conducted. Patients were classified according to the antibody involved: anti-D, other Rh (anti-c and anti-E), and anti-K1. Obstetric data, IUT characteristics, and neonatal outcome were compared. A specific study on the anti-D, when isolated or associated, was then conducted. RESULTS: There were 106 pregnancies included, with 77.4% having anti-D, 9.4% having another anti-Rh (Rh group), and 13.2% having anti-K1. No significant difference between the anti-D and Rh groups was found for management and prognosis. The hemoglobin level in the first IUT was higher in the anti-D group than in the Kell group (6.8 vs. 4.7 g/dL, p = 0.008). Newborns in the anti-D group had significantly higher bilirubin levels and phototherapy duration than those in the Kell group. The mean estimated daily decrease in hemoglobin and that between the first two IUTs were lower with an isolated anti-D, compared with anti-D associated with two antibodies (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Anti-K1 alloimmunizations seem to cause more severe fetal anemia than anti-D alloimmunizations. Moreover, a decrease in hemoglobin appears to be more rapid when anti-D is associated with other antibodies.